[kwlug-disc] Parliament adjourned ... bills dead (again!)?

[unsolicited]

Russell McOrmond wrote, On 03/30/2011 9:39 AM:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 7:30 PM, Chris Frey <cdfrey at foursquare.net> wrote:
>>        If Bill C-32 was balanced, why then must the artist (who is
>>        often poor) defend his rights in court, and the consumer
>>        (who is also poor) defend his rights in court, while the
>>        recording corporation (which is rich) gets to defend its
>>        rights in the very devices that play the media?
.
.
.
<snip bunch of good points, for the purposes of this post>
.
.
.

Perhaps Chris' question could be alternately phrased, then:

Mr. Candidate: Copyright legislation, in various forms, has been under 
consideration for some time now. Whom do you think such legislation 
will impact?

[Chris, you'll have to modify somehow to re-inject your concerns 
surrounding 'poor'.]