[kwlug-disc] "In the new Canada, the web browses you"
cdfrey at foursquare.net
Fri Aug 12 18:12:17 EDT 2011
You're probably thinking of the Clipper Chip, back in the 90's.
There was a large backlash, and it didn't catch on.
The potential upcoming legislation doesn't pertain to encryption, as
far as I know. They just want to be able to eavesdrop on your plaintext
internet traffic without a warrant.
How this is to be paid for, I'm not sure, but it sounds like they expect
ISPs to implement the data capture infrastructure.
Maybe this will renew a general interest in cryptography. :-)
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:08:36PM -0400, unsolicited wrote:
> This starts to feel like ... I'm groping here ...
> Wasn't there a U.S. encryption chip some time ago where their Feds
> were mandating that a master key be inserted for them?
> Seems to me that didn't happen, but I'm not sure of that.
> These articles feel like an ISP equivalent to those chips.
> Chris Frey wrote, On 08/12/2011 5:37 PM:
> >Another article on this topic, FYI:
> >On Fri, Aug 05, 2011 at 03:16:41PM -0400, Chris Frey wrote:
> >>An article on potential changes to ISP tracking requirements:
> >>My main concern is that government may have access to this data without
> >>a warrant. If the data is already public (like facebook and twitter)
> >>one thing, but if it is connecting private data (like home address) to
> >>that public data, with no warrant, that's another.
> >>I'm posting the link just to share information, not to provoke a long
> >>political discussion. :-)
> >>- Chris
> >>kwlug-disc mailing list
> >>kwlug-disc at kwlug.org
> >kwlug-disc mailing list
> >kwlug-disc at kwlug.org
> kwlug-disc mailing list
> kwlug-disc at kwlug.org
More information about the kwlug-disc