[kwlug-disc] [To keep Bob delirious.] Was, & still could be: Re: New geek in the area
plongstaff at rogers.com
Thu Sep 9 00:06:35 EDT 2010
What evidence do you have that DPI is thwarted?
I used to be a hypochondriac AND a kleptomaniac. So I took something for it.
From: Bob Jonkman <bjonkman at sobac.com>
To: KWLUG discussion <kwlug-disc at kwlug.org>
Sent: Thu, September 9, 2010 12:00:04 AM
Subject: Re: [kwlug-disc] [To keep Bob delirious.] Was, & still could be: Re:
New geek in the area
On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 23:49 -0400, Khalid Baheyeldin wrote:
> Bob Jonkman wrote, On 09/08/2010 11:29 PM:
> Single-line subscribers can still pay for the MLPPP
> service, then use their fancy router firmware to
> enable Single-Link PPP, or SLPPP. The header offset
> still applies, and Bell's DPI and throttling is
> effectively thwarted.
> If you have a single line, does it affect speed in any other way other
> than bypassing Bell's DPI?
I suppose that the six extra bytes for MLPPP reduce the packet payload
by 6 bytes/packet, and that theoretically slows things down.
In practice, I haven't noticed any difference at all.
Actually, now that Bell's throttling is thwarted certain members of the
household do nothing but Bittorrent Ubuntu ISOs all day long. Now
*that* slows down traffic for the rest of the family!
Bob Jonkman <bjonkman at sobac.com> http://sobac.com/sobac/
SOBAC Microcomputer Services Voice: +1-519-669-0388
6 James Street, Elmira ON Canada N3B 1L5 Cel: +1-519-635-9413
Software --- Office & Business Automation --- Consulting
kwlug-disc_kwlug.org mailing list
kwlug-disc_kwlug.org at kwlug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kwlug-disc