[kwlug-disc] Posting without subscribing to the KWLUG-Help list
unsolicited at swiz.ca
Wed Jun 2 14:43:28 EDT 2010
Richard Weait wrote, On 06/02/2010 2:35 PM:
> On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 2:21 PM, Insurance Squared Inc.
> <gcooke at insurancesquared.com> wrote:
>> I think we're running the risk of opening a can of worms on paul again,
>> which he's already noted is something he's trying to avoid :).
> And if the newcomers won't tell us what they want, we are restricted
> to guessing. So far, we've guessed incorrectly. Or have we?
> How do we tell the difference between unsuccessfully reaching out to a
> group of newcomers, and successfully reaching out to a group of zero
> Wasn't this most-recently kicked off based on discussions Paul had
> with newcomers _At The LUG Meeting_? Then we have succeeded. They
> were there and talking to somebody who could help them. Paul, am I
> remembering this correctly?
> This guesswork is fruitless.
> We should give the help list more than 48 hours to work.
> We should keep welcoming newcomers at the meetings.
> I don't see a line up of new folks, here, demanding attention. Or
> even asking a question.
> If you are a newcomer here, feel free to ask questions.
> We're friendly. Damnit.
Shall we take this thread to kwlug-help then? If there are no
newcomers yet, largely, they'll never see this meta-discussion by the
time they join.
More information about the kwlug-disc