[kwlug-disc] so ... what's your opinion on linux anti-virus software?
ldpaniak at fourpisolutions.com
Thu Feb 5 22:33:11 EST 2009
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
< Insert fantastically cogent uber-rant. >
If I hear you right, the short version goes like this: I use a computer
to get X done. It had better work when I need it. Just like the phone,
photocopier and toaster. If not, I need to get a new one.
If so, I agree completely. The computer is just another appliance for
the end-user. It should just work.
I see virus protection in Windows as the ultimate Achilles' Heel of the
whole MS world: You buy an OS, then have to pay another company an
annual tithe to keep it safe. Forget to pay, flush your files bye-bye.
Oh yeah, the anti-virus/spam/rootkit/trojan/worm/? software will get in
the way of most everything you do, hijack your hard drive for a scan
when you least want it to and make your modern CPU feel like an AMD K6.
For the end-user, I think we should trumpet the Linux desktop as a virus
- -immune environment: no extra cost, no performance hits, no worries.
Of course this sales pitch may have a limited lifetime (the Flash applet
ate my hard drive...), but I think we should play it as long as we can.
Apple users do it - albeit less successfully.
The less the end-user has to worry about, the better. If someone wants
to fret about viruses in Linux, let 'em read this about last spring's
Windows, Apple, ubuntu hacking contest (from a Mac POV):
Especially, "By the end of the contest, only the Linux system had not
As mentioned before, there are good reasons to run rkhunter or e-mail
scrubbing for MS clients on a server, but this is as relevant to the
end-user as klogd or the details of modern telephone call routing.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the kwlug-disc