[kwlug-disc] What would people like to do, under the auspices of kwlug?

[Darcy Casselman]

On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 12:25 PM, unsolicited <unsolicited at swiz.ca> wrote:
>> One thing to keep in mind is that we as a group have to be careful about
>> who adopts the name KWLUG.  I wouldn't like to see radical or
>> counter-productive activities being associated with KWLUG.
>
> Absolutely agreed. Although, the mechanics of any kwlug 'blessing' escapes
> me at the moment.

True.  But there are people who are more interested in complaining
abut what other people are doing than doing things themselves.  In
order to have an effective organization, you have to keep those people
from monopolizing the discussion.

I think people who want to do things should make their ideas known,
and give people a chance to give input.  But I wouldn't want to give
naysayers a veto.

Do we have a lot of radicals around? :)

People can just go ahead and do things anyway, with or without the
"kwlug" name.  Right now, it looks like the only way we have to say
whether something is or isn't related to kwlug is whether it shows up
on the website, or happens at a monthly meeting.  So I guess all you
need to do to get official kwlug sanction right now is convince
someone with access to the website that it's a good idea.

Darcy.