<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal>Yup – even in Server 2019, Microsoft hasn’t fixed its huge performance issues. </p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><b>From: </b><a href="mailto:kwlug-disc@kwlug.org">Paul Nijjar via kwlug-disc</a><br><b>Sent: </b>Wednesday, August 7, 2019 9:56 PM<br><b>To: </b><a href="mailto:kwlug-disc@kwlug.org">KWLUG discussion</a><br><b>Cc: </b><a href="mailto:paul_nijjar@yahoo.ca">Paul Nijjar</a><br><b>Subject: </b>Re: [kwlug-disc] Filesystems for backups</p></div><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>I remember you telling us at WWITPro a few years ago that ReFS sucks.</p><p class=MsoNormal>But that was a few years ago. Does it still suck? It is 2019 now.</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>- Paul</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 09:22:53PM -0400, Jason Eckert wrote:</p><p class=MsoNormal>> Using ZFS raidz (or raidz2 or raidz3) seems like the best fit for what you</p><p class=MsoNormal>> want.</p><p class=MsoNormal>> Yes, you can't add more drives easily to a raidz, but this is minor,</p><p class=MsoNormal>> because you can simply use multiple ZFS pools to extend storage.</p><p class=MsoNormal>> Speed and data reliability are the biggest benefits of ZFS.</p><p class=MsoNormal>> I do prefer FreeNAS myself (since I've used BSD for what seems like</p><p class=MsoNormal>> forever), but it works very well on Linux (I just wish ZFS could legally be</p><p class=MsoNormal>> incorporated into the kernel).</p><p class=MsoNormal>> ReFS sucks.</p><p class=MsoNormal>> </p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p><p class=MsoNormal>_______________________________________________</p><p class=MsoNormal>kwlug-disc mailing list</p><p class=MsoNormal>kwlug-disc@kwlug.org</p><p class=MsoNormal>http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org</p><p class=MsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p></div></body></html>