All<br /><br />I have skimmed through the emails in this thread and am impressed and intrigued by the depth of the knowledge on this issue.<br />However, for some of the newbies in the group/list I will mention a possible common error in the premise of the OP's original post.<br /><br />The OP starts out with "<span>WiFi reception in my house ...".<br /><br /></span>And herein in the error. (Or maybe not. )<br /><br />As with cell phones many use the term "reception" when referring to performance the device, e.g. cell phone, notebook, laptop, etc. They forget that there may be "reception" issues a the other end whether the other end is a wifi router or cell tower. The device is, after all, a two way instrument, both an RF receiver and a RF transmitter. RF signals are transmitted from the device and are received at the wifi router or cell tower.<br /><br />Efforts to increase the RF transmission signal strength at the wifi router to "increase range" will not address any problems of RF transmission at the device.<br /><br />There have been some good suggestions that may address issues with the two-way RF transmission/reception. One or more contributors mentioned relocating the router (with its antennae) and/or addressing any impediments in the environment which may serve to attenuate RF signals. At least one contributor mentioned repeaters or mesh networks.<br /><br />I will guess that there is not really much anyone can do with software in the wifi router to improve the <span>two-way RF transmission/reception in the router or device for that matter. The RF modulation/demodulation is performed in the chip set and this may be locked into the chip set. Of course, chip set drivers may be available and may help.</span><br /><br />John Johnson<br /><span>With apologies to the OP.</span><br /><br /><br /><hr /><strong>Subject:</strong> [kwlug-disc] Extending WiFi Range<br /><strong>Date:</strong> Wed, 29 Mar 2017 19:29:33 -0400<br /><strong>From:</strong> Khalid Baheyeldin <kb@2bits.com><br /><strong>To:</strong> KWLUG discussion <kwlug-disc@kwlug.org><br /><strong>Reply-To:</strong> kb@2bits.com, KWLUG discussion <kwlug-disc@kwlug.org><br /><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div dir="ltr">
<div>
<div>WiFi reception in my house, using the OpenWRT powered D-Link DIR-835, is generally adequate, but could be better in some spots. Reception is intermittent in the backyard, where I am pondering a project that would need it. Perhaps the basement's concrete is interfering?<br /><br /></div>
<div>I like OpenWRT and plan to stay with it. Also the router itself has lots of storage (flash) and RAM, so will be here for the future. It is in the basement, near the cable modem, and other equipment, and connected to the UPS in there. <br /><br />Moving it to the main floor is not likely since it would involve finding a power outlet and running Ethernet, as well as losing the UPS connection.<br /><br /></div>
So, my questions are:<br /><br /></div>
1. What does one do in this case? Do you buy another router, possibly one capable of running OpenWRT and turn off the router features, and keep it only as a WiFi hotspot and put it near the spots where good reception is needed?<br clear="all" />
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div> </div>
<div>2. If so, what are good routers that you tried this on?<br /><br /></div>
<div>3. How did you turn off OpenWRT routing ...etc. on it?<br /><br /></div>
<div>4. Does the new WiFi hotspot have its own SSID or can it use the same SSID as the main router?<br /><br /></div>
<div>Any other thoughts/ideas welcome.</div>
<div>-- <br />
<div class="gmail_signature">Khalid M. Baheyeldin<br /><a href="http://2bits.com">2bits.com</a>, Inc.<br />Fast Reliable Drupal<br />Drupal optimization, development, customization and consulting.<br />Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. -- Edsger W.Dijkstra<br />Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication. -- Leonardo da Vinci<br />For every complex problem, there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong." -- H.L. Mencken</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p> </p>
<div> </div>