<html><head></head><body>Right. I swear it was in the reply text when I sent the message. Give me a full keyboard any day. These little .virtual keyboard are for the birds.<br>
<br>
--Bob, who is more of a hunter than a pecker<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">Khalid Baheyeldin <kb@2bits.com> wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">I don't see a link.<br /><br />I assume you mean this, which was making the rounds today<br /><br /><a href="http://www.pcworld.com/article/2845072/ubuntu-owncloud-and-a-hidden-dark-side-of-linux-software-repositories.html">http://www.pcworld.com/article/2845072/ubuntu-owncloud-and-a-hidden-dark-side-of-linux-software-repositories.html</a><br /><br />On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Bob Jonkman <bjonkman@sobac.com> wrote:<br /><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 1ex 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid #729fcf; padding-left: 1ex;">Of course, it isn't just ownCloud. Nobody knows how many other vulnerable<br />packages exist in Universe where the packagers have abandoned the software<br />and the developers haven't taken the responsible step of requesting its<br />removal.<br /><br />This article seems particularly biased against ownCloud. It neglects to<br />mention that the only supported repository is the SUSE build servers (which<br />is what I demonstrated in my presentation), and that other people took it<br />upon themselves to package it for Ubuntu and then failed to maintain it.<br /><br />--Bob.<br /><br /><br /><hr /><br />kwlug-disc mailing list<br />kwlug-disc@kwlug.org<br /><a href="http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org">http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org</a></blockquote><br /><br /><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>