<div dir="ltr">Maybe you just discovered the real reason behind the shutdown: they're trying to scare people into sending money!<div><br></div><div>The game's not over yet. Already people are stepping forward to take over development, or fork it, or make a new alternative, you name it.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Something good will come out of this eventually.</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 30 May 2014 13:43, unsolicited <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:unsolicited@swiz.ca" target="_blank">unsolicited@swiz.ca</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Ah! Good point. Missed that.<br>
<br>
But all this does demonstrate that we all can't be complacent - let us not allow this FUD to do away with TrueCrypt.<br>
<br>
OTOH, given that HeartBleed triggered some more funding, here's hoping the same happens here. (Which could have been the intent of things, for all I know.)<br>
<br>
On 14-05-30 01:36 PM, CrankyOldBugger wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Read what I said, which was "I'll be sad if..." not "I am sad because..."<br>
<br>
I never said that there's no more TrueCrypt for Windows. It's a good<br>
product that I am still using now despite the recent news.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 30 May 2014 13:30, unsolicited <<a href="mailto:unsolicited@swiz.ca" target="_blank">unsolicited@swiz.ca</a><br>
<mailto:<a href="mailto:unsolicited@swiz.ca" target="_blank">unsolicited@swiz.ca</a>>> wrote:<br>
<br>
Personally I'll be sad if there's no more TrueCrypt for Windows as I<br>
use it regularly on one of my boxes.<br>
<br>
<br>
What makes you think there's no more TrueCrypt for Windows?<br>
<br>
Works fine on my Win 8.1 install. (Note, not using it on the system<br>
drive, or any drive at all, for the moment.) Have a backup running<br>
over the web via OpenVPN to a shared container on the laptop. Key<br>
exists on the remote only.<br>
<br>
Works fine. I have no reason to believe it won't any time soon. From<br>
Linux too.<br>
<br>
Even if there later turns out to be a vulnerability, the bar to make<br>
use of it is so high as to not be worth worrying about.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
kwlug-disc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kwlug-disc@kwlug.org" target="_blank">kwlug-disc@kwlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org" target="_blank">http://kwlug.org/mailman/<u></u>listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
kwlug-disc mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:kwlug-disc@kwlug.org" target="_blank">kwlug-disc@kwlug.org</a><br>
<a href="http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org" target="_blank">http://kwlug.org/mailman/<u></u>listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>