<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#ffffff">
Won? lol. no. What 'won' was a pending federal election. If this
issue would have been raised 2 years ago, or a year hence, the response
would've been dead silence.<br>
<br>
g.<br>
<br>
<br>
On 03/02/11 11:02 AM, Colin Mackay wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:AANLkTikiE-CwNahhWr+0AQaJ_rX5ZxzH8YeO44-r=TV2@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<h1 class="headline"><font size="2">CRTC must reverse internet usage
ruling: Clement</font></h1>
<font style="font-family: courier new,monospace;" size="2">Asked by
the CBC's Rosemary Barton through Twitter whether it's true that
Clement would overturn that decision if the Canadian Radio-television
and Telecommunications Commission does not back down, the industry
minister replied: "True. CRTC must go back to drawing board."</font><br>
<br>
It's a victory, but did we win the war, or just the battle? If the
CRTC is being asked to go back to the drawing board, what do you think
will come next? Sam thing with a better percentage for the smaller
ISPs, or will the CRTC grow a backbone and actually listen to the
average Canadians it's supposed to represent?<br>
<br>
I posted this on another thread, but the thread was miles long, so I'll
start a discussion here...<br>
<br>
<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2011/02/03/crtc-internet-clement.html?ref=rss">http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2011/02/03/crtc-internet-clement.html?ref=rss</a><br>
<pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
kwlug-disc mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kwlug-disc@kwlug.org">kwlug-disc@kwlug.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org">http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>