[kwlug-disc] So, I took the plunge... Mail In A Box

[Chamunks]

Spf records are different now that the specifications are finalized too
which might be part of your problem @Khalid you just use txt records now
officially.

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018, 3:06 PM Khalid Baheyeldin <kb at 2bits.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 1:44 PM, bob+kwlug at softscape.ca <
> bob+kwlug at softscape.ca> wrote:
>
>> Chamunks wrote:
>>
>> > I think you're right mostly however I think that there could be great
>> > benefit from everyone running their own email servers instead of the
>> cloud
>> > doing it. The only problem is the entry level complexity.  If we had
>> > something like docker and open source solutions for continuous
>> integration
>> > and deployment it would be perfect.
>> >
>> > But I'm crazy I envision a world of both convenience and security.
>>
>> Hehe, yeah. But you're the good kind of crazy.
>>
>
> There is nothing crazy about what Chamunks is doing.
>
> It is actually a 'take back control of your infrastructure' thing, and
> against centralization of it with companies, rather than a distributed
> system built over standard protocols.
>
> I really applaud this attempt.
>
> This thread is tempting me to go back to my email server setup and try to
> fix the issues with it.
>
> When I setup DKIM and SPF a couple of years back, I thought all is well.
> Now the mail test page is saying the score is 3/10, and flags DKIM and SPF
> (probably because I am sending email from a satellite server, over port
> 587, and need to do something about those satellites too).
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kwlug-disc mailing list
> kwlug-disc at kwlug.org
> http://kwlug.org/mailman/listinfo/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://kwlug.org/pipermail/kwlug-disc_kwlug.org/attachments/20180222/26da92d2/attachment.htm>