dscassel at gmail.com
Sun May 11 10:57:55 EDT 2014
Mozilla takes that stance that if you take their code, say for Firefox, and
change it (as is your right under their license), it is no longer Firefox
and cannot be branded as such (as is their right as the brand-holder).
The code is free; the brand is not.
Ubuntu takes a similar stance, allowing the mark (or similar mark) be used
for a limited set of officially recognized derivatives (kubuntu, xubuntu,
lubuntu, Ubuntu Studio, edubuntu, and ubuntu gnome).
On Sun, May 11, 2014 at 6:54 AM, unsolicited <unsolicited at swiz.ca> wrote:
> Guess I wasn't very clear.
> I get the whole fork of Mozilla stuff, and that forks need to be branded
> The mucking with stuff is within the app itself, nothing to do with the
> On 14-05-10 11:09 PM, Bob Jonkman wrote:
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>> unsolicited asks:
>>> Why they have to keep mucking with it,
>> License restrictions on non-free software.
> kwlug-disc mailing list
> kwlug-disc at kwlug.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kwlug-disc