[kwlug-disc] CAT6 - worthwhile?
johneddie.kerr at gmail.com
Sat Oct 26 11:26:28 EDT 2013
My current router at work is rated at 56mb. I just purchased a new router
rated up to 300mbps. Great except the Internet comes in at 25mbps.
I have purchased a new wireless printer as well.
So I bought the new router so that any printing jobs will be done faster.
Am I in my right mind on this?
To me it is the last 50 feet that are important. Will there soon be a
wireless Internet service that will give us the speed that our routers are
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 2:30 AM, unsolicited <unsolicited at swiz.ca> wrote:
> OK, but my real basic question is, to what end?
> Gigabit has even now not permeated enough of the world. (Why any laptop
> still comes with 10/100 is beyond me). Even my USB 3.0 / gigabit adapter
> can't saturate the gigabit.
> Future proof for what (copper wise)?
> If the world is going tablets and phones - that's wifi, not copper. Even
> if you have copper and an AP at each room for wi-fi devices to connect to,
> no amount of devices on that wi-fi will ever saturate the gigabit - wi-fi
> will never be that fast. (?)
> Home wise, I'm not prepared to even put out for multi-run bonding - the
> equipment required at each end is extraordinarily expensive (for home). I
> don't imagine it's any different for 10Gps CAT6 ethernet, let alone fibre.
> And if it's fibre we get to, the copper run, 5e or 6, isn't going to be
> So if most things can't saturate gigabit now, and fibre is going to need
> another run anyways if we get there ... future proof for what (sorts of
> beasties / media)?
> I'm not objecting to 6 over 5e, I just wonder ... for what?
> - especially given the more expensive equipment required at each switch
> point, and the tighter bend and untwist limits for 6. I'd bet every home 6
> installation breaks at each jack / switch / 5e device<->jack cable.
> If you've bent a cable, what, more than 30 degrees, or untwisted a pair,
> or untwisted pairs more than 1/2 inch - you've just made using cat 6
> So my real question was ... what's coming that might need 6 over 5e?
> In house HD video distribution?
> On 13-10-25 04:57 PM, John Van Ostrand wrote:
>> Personally I think any new installation should use Cat 6. It's only
>> marginally more expensive than 5e but could future-proof your house a
>> little more. That said 5e will perform very well in a house since runs
>> to be short and will work in cases where Cat 6 is supposedly required. The
>> way I look at it is that the time spend installing is the the most
>> expensive cost (even when done yourself) so using a higher grade cable
>> future-proofs so you can avoid pulling everything out and re-doing cable.
>> Sometimes I'll use 5e jacks because those are easier to replace.
> kwlug-disc mailing list
> kwlug-disc at kwlug.org
Every child born increases by one the group of people Sir Winston Churchill
called the "so many", who owe so much to the group he called the "so few".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the kwlug-disc