[kwlug-disc] Fwd: Re: [WLSG] Letter-writing meeting [urgent-ish]
richard at weait.com
Mon Jun 14 12:51:45 EDT 2010
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 11:19 AM, Paul Nijjar <paul_nijjar at yahoo.ca> wrote:
> - One core phrase that was floated around a lot was the idea that
> "circumvention of digital locks should be allowed for non-infringing
> purposes". That is, if the use that you would be using media for
> would not be infringing copyright ordinarily, then breaking a
> digital lock should be okay. It seems like an elegant way of
> expressing the issue to me, but maybe I am on drugs.
Were these considered? Are these any good?
"Circumvention of digital locks should not criminalize what is
otherwise non-infringing use."
"Fair dealing trumps anti-circ."
More information about the kwlug-disc_kwlug.org