[kwlug-disc] What's the best desktop distribution?
cdfrey at foursquare.net
Thu Feb 4 16:48:50 EST 2010
On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 04:31:40PM -0500, Khalid Baheyeldin wrote:
> I don't think Paul was saying he would pull Drupal/Gem/CPAN/PECL/...etc
> stuff from any random site. He would be getting them from the authoritative
> repository (e.g. drupal.org, cpan.org, php.net, ...etc.)
> So the security risk here is minimal.
True. I consider that "random" to some extent too, unless the sites
I download from have a steady signed download process.
I didn't mean to imply that Paul runs just anything. :-)
> So Lori is right. The problem is that people aren't using apt enough.
> > If you go to the trouble of making your own repository, might
> > as well put it on the net, and share it.
> That is exactly what CPAN/PECL/Drupal do ...
Well, well! So they do!
I assume that solves a good chunk of the problem. Thanks.
> Yes, but Paul's point is that we have a myriad of them for each language.
> Even though it is fairly easy to pull stuff from the respective repository
> for that language, it bypasses APT's dependency checking mechanism.
I'm a little confused by this. Why would they make deb packages
that don't have the right dependencies? Apt just provides what the deb's
themselves ask for.
> The issue here is release cycles. Debian is very slow to come with
> stable releases compared ot other stuff. For example, Drupal used
> to have a 6-8 month release cycle for core, and several hundred
> modules. Now the cycle is more like 2 years for core, but there
> are 3,000 or more modules out there, with various maintainers.
> They tend to move at their own pace, often very quick, and hence
> does not fit into the Debian repositories. We had really old stuff
> in Debian as far as Drupal is concerned.
... the dependencies of the manual deb packages mean that you
have to run Debian unstable all the time?
More information about the kwlug-disc_kwlug.org