[kwlug-disc] definition of debian's "stable"?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Mon Aug 17 06:27:56 EDT 2009
On Mon, 17 Aug 2009, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 01:12:26PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > the impression i get is that
> > 1) if you're targeting the "stable" release, the *only* upgrades
> > you'll normally get are strictly security-related, not bug fixes.
> > 2) eventually, once enough useful big fixes *do* accumulate, a new
> > "point release" comes out (5.0.1, 5.0.2?) which *will* allow
> > non-security-related issues to be addressed. but this will still
> > fall under the "stable" release name, right?
> That's correct. I once reported a bug in pango in Lenny, and got a
> patch back to test, which worked, and it had to wait for the next
> point release... I think it's in 5.0.2 now.
fair enough, but that tells me that the current documentation (and i
am reading the latest docs) is misleading.
the docs are quite adamant that, once a release is, well, released,
then the *only* updates you'll get will be strictly security-related.
however, as you describe above, non-security-related fixes *can* be
included in point releases, which as best as i can tell, will *still*
be included as part of the "stable" upgrade stream, no?
i have no problem if that's the case. it's just not the impression
you'd get by reading the current docs.
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
More information about the kwlug-disc