[kwlug-disc] why would you do "apt-get dist-upgrade" regularly?
Robert P. J. Day
rpjday at crashcourse.ca
Sat Aug 15 13:24:15 EDT 2009
On Sat, 15 Aug 2009, Eric Gerlach wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 12:31:38PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> > yup, that's my understanding, which is why, earlier this week,
> > when i wanted to upgrade a system from sarge to etch, i *first*
> > just upgraded the sarge install -- that upgraded just over 70
> > packages, after which the system continued to run fine. that was
> > what i considered phase 1 -- getting "sarge" completely up to
> > date.
> > the next phase -- which i haven't done yet -- will be to edit
> > /etc/apt/sources.list, change "sarge" to "etch", and run a *full*
> > upgrade, which i'm assuming will take the system to a
> > fully-upgraded etch system. that is, not just the *original* etch
> > install, but one that incorporates all of the etch upgrades that
> > followed. at that point, i will have a fully-upgraded etch
> > system, which i will allow to run for a while, watch carefully,
> > and fix any possible breakage.
> That sounds good for a phase 2, but read Etch's release notes first.
> I seem to recall that there were one or two packages you had to
> upgrade first (if they were installed) before doing the dist
ah, that's useful info. my plan was to do a "dry-run" first, to see
if there were any complaints. would a dry run of a full upgrade
identify potential problems like that? in any event, i'll check the
release notes. thanks.
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
More information about the kwlug-disc